Patryk Stachowiak
Boxing doesn’t do subtle. And this one? This is anything but.
Oleksandr Usyk — undisputed king, pound-for-pound genius, unbeaten machine — is set to defend his WBC heavyweight title against… a kickboxing legend with one pro boxing fight.
Yes. You read that right.
On May 23, 2026, under the shadow of the Pyramids of Giza, Usyk vs Rico Verhoeven headlines a spectacle dubbed “Glory in Giza.”
But here’s the real question: Is this actually a legitimate title fight?
Fight Details: What’s Actually on the Line?
This is a scheduled 12-round heavyweight clash.
Usyk walks in at 24-0, holding the WBA, IBF, and WBC belts — but only the WBC title is on the line here.
The WBO? Vacated.
Across the ring stands Rico Verhoeven. A monster in kickboxing. A complete unknown in boxing.
His record? 1-0, one KO… back in 2014.
That’s over a decade out of the boxing spotlight.
And yet — this is for a world title.
Is Usyk vs Verhoeven a Real Title Fight?
Yes. Officially, it is.
The WBC has sanctioned the bout as a legitimate heavyweight title defense, approved as a voluntary defense by their Board of Governors.
Usyk pushed for it. And he got it.
“One time I want to do what I want,” Usyk said, brushing aside criticism and mandatory challengers.
The fight is listed as an official WBC championship bout, confirmed across multiple platforms, including the WBC’s own channels and major boxing outlets.
No exhibition. No gimmick label. This is real — at least on paper.
The Massive Skill Gap No One Can Ignore
This is one of the strangest matchups in modern heavyweight boxing.
Usyk is a three-time undisputed champion. Olympic gold medalist. A technician who dismantled Fury, Joshua, and Dubois.
Verhoeven? A kickboxing icon with a 66-10 record, 21 KOs, and over a decade of dominance in Glory.
Different sport. Different rules. Different world.
Even critics — and there are many — are calling it a mismatch, questioning why a world title is involved at all.
And they’ve got a point.
Why the WBC Said Yes (This Time)
Here’s where it gets controversial.
Back in 2023, the WBC refused to sanction Tyson Fury vs Francis Ngannou as a title fight.
Ngannou had zero boxing experience.
Sound familiar? Fast forward to 2026 — and the WBC flips the script.
This time, they approved it. The reasoning?
Usyk’s track record of beating elite competition… and Verhoeven’s status as an all-time great in kickboxing.
Still, critics argue it sets a dangerous precedent — especially with contenders like Agit Kabayel waiting in line.
Verhoeven’s Confidence vs Reality
Verhoeven isn’t showing up to survive.
He’s talking about winning. By decision. Maybe even by power.
“When I land my best punch he will go down,” he said confidently.
Bold words. But this isn’t kickboxing.
No kicks. No clinch-heavy exchanges. No Glory rule set.
This is Usyk’s world — and historically, nobody beats him there.
Why This Fight Exists at All
Simple answer? Usyk chose it.
At 39, nearing the twilight of his career, he’s ticking boxes on his own terms.
Legacy fights. Unique challenges. Global spectacles.
And honestly? Fighting at the Pyramids might be the most “Usyk” move imaginable.
He’s already hinted at future plans — Dubois rematch, Fury trilogy, maybe more.
This? This is the wildcard in between.
Real Fight, Unreal Situation
Usyk vs Verhoeven is 100% a real WBC title fight.
It’s sanctioned. It’s official. It counts.
But it’s also controversial, unusual, and walking the line between elite sport and global spectacle.
And that’s exactly why everyone’s watching.
Because whether it’s a mismatch or a miracle… you don’t ignore a fight like this.
Want more breakdowns, betting angles, and fight analysis like this?
Stay locked in with TipsGG — because when boxing gets weird, we make sense of it.